Hmm.. Hav a better understanding now.. but then.....I define it as understanding and commitment between each other... lol..
Cause if you commit to each other but never understand each other throughly, not that good right? :P
But hmm.. if you don't see/accompany each other, do that makes a relationship? I don't really think so.. Cause in a relationship, there must also be intimacy right? and that involves meeting that person face to face.. If I am mistaken, correct me.. lol..
---------
Anna's reply:I like the way you think.. the reason I wouldn't involve understanding in the definition is probably because I was identifying love relationships in general, despite the fact whether it was a good love relationship or not.. lol! If it was in terms of a good love relationship, well, then I guess, there are loads of other things to add, isn't there? Hehe..
Secondly, addressing your statement involving intimacy, I get what you mean. You're actually right. I totally agree with you- there has to be some sort of communication between the two. That's why if relationships are about real commitment, there will be real communication. Therefore, I summarized it as commitment, that's it. Got it? :)
Once again, intimacy is the result of a healthy relationship, but unfortunately, not all relationships have intimacy. They are therefore unhealthy relationships, but relationships nonetheless.
* tRUST & OBey the LORD *
No comments:
Post a Comment